Artificial intelligence has infected every corner of academia — and now, some scientists are fighting back with a weird trick. In a new investigation, reporters from Japan's Nikkei Asia found more ...

Background The burden of cardiovascular events in Africa is projected to rise significantly in the coming decade, placing ...

Over the past 400 years or so, a set of mostly unwritten guidelines has evolved for how science should be properly done. The ...

Feedback can be a powerful force in college classrooms. This comprehensive guide will show you how to provide it in more effective ways.

The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research integrity.

It’s now standard for new findings to undergo peer review, a process in which outside experts offer critical feedback that a researcher must address before their work ends up in a journal.

Where the associate editor’s feedback was clear, instructive and helpful, the peer reviewer’s feedback was vague, confusing, and did nothing to improve my work.

IOP Publishing (IOPP) has announced it is celebrating Peer Review Week, and is raising awareness of the importance of constructive, respectful peer review feedback and how innovations can help to ...

More recently, in 2020, in his large-scale review of previous studies on peer response, Dan Melzer found that “Students learn as much from reading their peers’ drafts as they do from the comments they ...

Among its series of baffling AI-generated images is a mislabeled figure of a mouse with grotesquely large testicles.